Criteria / Level |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Presentation Roles and Cohesion “are you engaged in your own presentation” |
The team member played a
small or insignificant role in the presentation |
A role was played by the
team member but the impact had limited significance |
The team member had an
active and contributing role |
Rehearsal was evident as
one watched this member present and transition between segments |
Addressing the Expectation “have you given your peers the opportunity to
increase their understanding of your topic” |
The information presented
by this team member was sparse and superficial in nature indicating
insufficient research |
Some information was
relevant but limited and its impact was lost by a lack of preparation |
The information presented
by this team member was significant
and relevant to the expectation
topic |
Bullets & graphics
appeared on the slides while the team member painted the picture and filled
in the gaps |
Audience Engagement “knowing the material well enough that you can concentrate
on presentation” |
The team member’s head was
down (or their back was to the audience) almost all of the time as they
struggled to read the information |
The team member spent more
time with their notes and slides than engaging the audience with voice and
eye contact |
The team member made
frequent eye contact with the audience and rarely read from their notes or the
screen |
The team member reached or
surpassed their potential. Their
performance improved the presentation’s impact |
Simple Fact: Ready to Present? Flash Drive & Day |
No |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
Yes |